Tort Reform by Any Other Name

A rose by any other name may smell as sweet, but tort reform still smells bad to traditional opponents despite an attractive title.  That’s why most observers believe that the House-passed “Protecting Access to Care Act,” H.R. 1215, is going nowhere.

Opponents don’t oppose the goal of protecting access to care.  They oppose the means employed by the bill: limitations on medical malpractice lawsuits, including caps on damages and plaintiff attorney fees.  Provisions include a statute of limitations as short as one-year from discovery of the injury, a $250,000 cap on noneconomic damages, and a sliding-scale limit on attorney fees declining from 40% of the first $50,000 to 15% of amounts above $600,000.

The bill passed the House with no Democratic support and opposition by 19 Republicans.  No senator has sponsored a companion bill.  Despite support by the White House, the bill is seen as unpopular with conservative senators, who believe it’s an intrusion of federal authority into state law.

Speak Your Mind